| Sewer District Recap | |||||||||
| Capital Costs | |||||||||
| Description | Petition | OWL Proposed | |||||||
| Assessment Agreed to by Petition | $ 12,150.00 | ||||||||
| Overage agreed to by Petition | $ 1,822.50 | ||||||||
| Actual Assessment levied by Towship | $ 12,600.00 | ||||||||
| Capital Charges in quarterly bill at $12 / quarter | $ 960.00 | ||||||||
| Additional $5.16 / quarter Capital Charge | $ 412.80 | ||||||||
| Total | $ 13,972.50 | $ 13,972.80 | |||||||
| Proposed Scenarios | |||||||||
| Description | Present | Township Proposed | OWL Proposed | Full Fluidity | |||||
| Operating and Maintenance per Quarter per REU | $ 43.00 | $ 68.52 | $ 68.52 | $ 68.52 | |||||
| Administrative Rate per Quarter per REU | $ 5.00 | $ 5.60 | $ 5.60 | $ 5.60 | |||||
| Capital Replacement Charge per Quarter per REU | $ 12.00 | 1 | 4 | 8 | $ 12.71 | ||||
| Hardship debt assumption per Quarter per REU | 2 | 5 | 9 | $ 1.82 | |||||
| Capital Charge per Quarter per REU | $ 12.00 | $ 41.00 | 6 | $ 17.16 | 10 | $ 115.39 | |||
| Total | $ 72.00 | 3 | $ 115.12 | 7 | $ 91.28 | 11 | $ 204.04 | ||
| 1 - Money was to be set aside but per Marsha Strong caid it was spent to partially cover the operating deficit from last year. | |||||||||
| 2 - Apparently unanticipated in original rate structure or assumed to be the responsibility of the general fund. | |||||||||
| 3 - Leaves township with $727,000.00 / year shortfall in both Capital and O&M. | |||||||||
| 4 - Township Loans sewer district $70,000 per year for at least 1 year for capital replacement | |||||||||
| 5 - Township loans sewer district $10,000 per year for at least 1 year for Hardship cases. | |||||||||
| 6 - Township arbitrarily sets capital replacement charge at $41/quarter leaving approximately $390,000.00 to be loaned by Township. | |||||||||
| 7 - Township proposes to LOAN sewer district approximately $420,000.00 per year for 1 year. | |||||||||
| 8 - OWL proposes a 1 year moretorium on capital replacement and a study to determine what it should be. | |||||||||
| 9 - OWL Proposes that the Township make separate and binding deals (i.e. leans) with applicable homeowners and not the sewer district. | |||||||||
| 10 - OWL proposes that the sewer district pay what it legally bound to by petition. This leaves a capital deficit of approximately $530000.00 | |||||||||
| 11 - OWL proposes that the township delay the implementation of the capital replacement charge pending investigation and loan the district what is required for the year. The Township loan individual hardship cases appropriate monies outside of the sewer district. OWL also proposes based on petition verbage that the Township assume responsibility for the additional $530,000 / year and determine methods of funding outside of the existing sewer district. | |||||||||